Geriatric evaluation methods in oncology and their use in clinical studies: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic options in oncology keep on expanding. Nonetheless, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials and those enrolled often have a better health status than their average peers, resulting in a lack of representative evidence for this heterogenous population. The inclusion of older patients and a uniform categorization of "frailty" is becoming increasingly urgent. Standardized tools could contribute to the quality and comparability of clinical trials and facilitate clinical decisions. The aim of this literature review was to elaborate an overview of the use of geriatric evaluation (GE) methods in clinical cancer research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature review of the PubMed database. Clinical pharmacotherapy studies that applied or evaluated a clearly defined system for the GE of oncological patients were included. Data retrieved encompassed the applied GE method(s), cancer type(s), and pharmacotherapy investigated, the number of included patients, study type, year of publication, as well as the primary purpose of the GE. The GEs used most frequently were depicted in more depth. RESULTS: In this literature review, 103 publications were selected for inclusion. The biggest proportion of studies (36%, n = 34) used clearly defined, but not previously validated, GE methods (study-specific GE). Standardized GE methods encountered in at least five publications were the G8 screening test (applied in 18% of included studies, n = 17), the Balducci score (7%, n = 7), and a geriatric assessment based on Hurria (5%, n = 5). The primary purpose of GE was predominantly an appraisal of its potential role in pharmacotherapy optimization. The GE also served as baseline and outcome measure, inclusion/exclusion criterion, factor for stratified randomization, and to determine treatment allocation. DISCUSSION: The wide range of GE methods used across studies make direct comparisons difficult, and many methods are poorly characterized and/or not previously validated. The further inclusion of representative older patients in clinical trials combined with the use of a standardized GE could help clinicians in the decision-making process.

Metastatic Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Colon with Response to Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab: A Case Report.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a rare, aggressive tumor arising from different localizations along the gastrointestinal tract with generally poor prognosis. We present the case of a 51-year-old female patient with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of a MANEC of the descending colon. At presentation, the tumor had already spread to the liver causing extensive hepatic metastases. Immunohistochemical examination showed 5%-10% of tumor cells to express the programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 and FoundationOne testing revealed a high mutational tumor burden with 149 Muts/Mb. The patient responded very well clinically and radiologically to anti-programmed death 1 receptor monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab therapy after having undergone 3 previous systemic treatment regimens as well as selective internal radiation therapy of her hepatic metastases. Clinical improvement was evident after the first infusion already and is ongoing for 10 months so far with very little side effects including initial and short lived skin irritation as well as muscle pain. To our knowledge, this is the first published case where a MANEC was successfully treated with immunotherapy targeting the programmed death 1 receptor.